David Belasco Co. v. Klaw
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
These two cases were, by arrangement between counsel, tried together, upon the theory that the court would, by pursuing such a course, become informed fully of the facts involved in the entire controversy between the parties, and might be enabled more satisfactorily and *598within a briefer time to dispose of the issues, than the same results could be accomplished by separate trials. Both actions are founded upon articles of copartnership, and the relief prayed for in each is a dissolution and an accounting. Those written articles are subscribed by Joseph Brooks and David Belasco, and contain,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Briggs v. . PartridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Coleman v. . First National Bank of ElmiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Byington v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Selwyn & Co. v. WallerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Selwyn & Co. v. WallerNew York Supreme Court · 1913