Hoover v. Par Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
This is an action upon a promissory note and guaranty statement. The case was tried to the court. Both parties requested findings of facts and conclusions of law. Judgment was entered for plaintiffs in the sum of $42,251.00 and costs. Cross-appeals were filed. The judgment is affirmed.
Cross-appeals have been filed. For purposes of clarity, the parties are referred to herein as plaintiffs and defendants. The plaintiffs are Edna M. Hoover and Mercantile Bank and Trust Company, co-executors of the estate of James G. Hoover. The defendants are Par Electrical Contractors, Inc.,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Aluma Kraft Manufacturing Co. v. Elmer Fox & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Stephen & Stephen Properties, Inc. v. State Tax Com'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ConeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,130 Pittsburgh Coke & Chemical Company v. Louis J. BolloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Labrier v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Pettis County R-XII School District v. KahrsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008