Legal Opinion

Crum v. Stasney

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1966No. 4048PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINGS, Justice.

Homer Crum brought this suit against Homer Stasney for personal injury and disability alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff by being kicked or otherwise injured by a mule owned by defendant. It was alleged that the injury was sustained on the defendant’s ranch in Brown County, Texas, on or about January 1, 1962. Upon a hearing the court sustained the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and judgment was entered denying plaintiff any recovery. Homer Crum has appealed.

The record shows that on January 1, 1962, appellee Stasney was the owner and operator of a ranch in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Griffin v. Superior Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Carlisle v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Texas-Louisiana Power Co. v. DanielsTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Burton Construction & Shipbuilding Co. v. BroussardTexas Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peerenboom v. HSP Foods, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
  2. Knorpp v. Hale, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  3. Holly Sugar Company of Hereford v. AguirreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. St. Clergy v. NorthcuttCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Clifford and Vickie Peerenboom, Individually and as Next Friends of Jo Ann Peerenboom, a Minor v. HSP Foods, Inc., D/B/A Jack in the Box, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API