Legal Opinion

State v. Mates

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 20, 1913No. 20,248PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Martha Mates was charged with unlawfully] retailing spirituous liquors without a license, and applied for a preliminary examination. Her application was refused, and she applies for a writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

LAND, J-.

On September 29, 1913, an information was filed against the relator for unlawfully retailing spirituous liquors without a license. She was arrested the next day, and immediately applied to the district judge for a preliminary examination. The request was refused, and relator at once applied to this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent judge to grant her a preliminary examination.

The return of the judge is, in substance, that the relator was arrested under an information, and made no request for the fixing of appearance bond, but demanded a preliminary examination,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LemingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. State v. MarchettiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  3. United States v. AverettDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1928
  4. State v. MarchettiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
  5. State v. BertrucciSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API