Legal Opinion

Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Craighead

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1915No. 421PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHarper, C. J.

Counsel for appellee have filed an able motion for rehearing, and insist that under the provisions of article 1631, R. S., this court has no authority to reverse and remand this case for the error indicated in the original opinion; that we could only indicate to appellee the amount of the excess in the verdict and, judgment, and require a remittitur thereof as a condition of affirmance.

The statute noted provides that in cases where this court shall be of the opinion that the verdict and judgment of the trial court is excessive, and for that reason only, said cause should be reversed, then it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. T. N. O. R. R. Co. v. SyfanTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Gulf Railway Co. v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. New York Life Insurance Co. v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. KelloggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. ClementCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API