Palmer v. Edgerly

On Motion for Rehearing. After the foregoing opinion was filed, the defendants moved for a rehearing.

Woodbury, J.

In support of their motion the defendants, without denying that their photographs were erroneously admitted, assert that such admission “was harmless error because the total lack of evidence of similarity was so apparent that all reasonable men must agree that it had no tendency to show that the bay window involved was not dangerous in character, i.e., the evidence erroneously admitted was so wholly lacking in evidentiary value that it is impossible for such evidence to have…