North Baltimore Passenger Railway Co. v. Arnreich
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The second prayer of the defendant, which the Court below (Ritchie, J.-,) refused, is set out in full in the opinion of this Court. The insertion of the other prayers of the defendant, as also those of the plaintiff, is deemed unnecessary. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $5,500, and judgment was entered thereon. The defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
The defendant company owns and operates a street railway in the City of Baltimore. At about half past seven o’clock in the evening of January 15th, 1892, the plaintiff, going northward on Howard street, sought to cross Centre street, and was run over and injured by one of .the defendant’s cars. The railway track of the defendant extends up Howard street to Centre street; then turns to the right, and continues in an easterly direction down Centre street. The plaintiff, coming up on the Bast side of Howard street, on the evening of the accident, was compelled to pass over the track of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Driscoll v. Market Street Cable RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- McMahon v. Northern Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. McDonnell ex rel. McDonnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Baltimore Traction Co. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Kean v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Barry v. Burlington Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Lake Roland Elevated Railway Co. v. McKewenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Baltimore City Passenger Ry. Co. v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Baltimore Traction Co. v. AppelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895