Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 2003No. 2D02-3831PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Anthony Jackson appeals a judgment for burglary of a dwelling, opposing an officer without violence, and petit theft. We affirm the judgment without further comment. As the State concedes, however, the face of the judgment contains a scrivener’s error. The judgment indicates that Mr. Jackson was adjudicated guilty of petit theft as a first-degree misdemeanor. See § 812.014(1), (2)(e), Fla. Stat. (2001). In fact, Jackson was adjudicated guilty of pet-it theft as a second-degree misdemeanor. See § 812.014(1), (3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001).

We remand the judgment for the circuit court to correct this…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Milin v. Northwest Florida Land, LCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Bourne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API