Legal Opinion

Lasher v. S. Bolton's Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Bernice L. B. Lasher, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Rensselaer Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Rensselaer on the 20th day of October, 1913, directing plaintiff to submit to have an X-ray picture taken of her right foot.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained to the plaintiff’s right foot through the negligence of the defendant, it being alleged that *382the latter ran over the plaintiff’s right foot with a heavy beer wagon, crushing the bones, etc. The plaintiff, through her attorney, consented that a physician, James T. McKenna, might make a physical examination of the foot in behalf of the defendant, and such examination appears to have been made on the 16th day of May, 1913. After the case was noticed for trial, and upon being reached on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lyon v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hayt v. Brewster, Gordon & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Hollister v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Bloom v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  4. Gregory v. Acme Road Machinery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. Pahl v. BisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API