Legal Opinion
Mejia v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 10, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant New York City Housing Authority appeals, and the defendant Trocom Construction separately appeals, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated November 24, 2005, as denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The plaintiff Pedro Mejia (hereinafter the plaintiff) tripped and fell while walking backwards, looking up, and spraying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Malanga v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Williams v. O & Y Concord 60 Broad Street Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Pickering v. Lehrer, McGovern, Bovis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dooley v. Vornado Realty TrustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Selis v. Town of N. HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025