Legal Opinion

In re Seapharm, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 26, 1991No. Bankruptcy No. 88-04678Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM H. GINDIN, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

At the hearing on this matter which took place on March 18, 1991, the court determined that the actual costs of the adction should be borne by the secured creditor, Banco Hispano Americano. Additionally, determination was reserved as to whether or not the auctioneer was entitled to a commission from the estate on the sale of shares of stock in an entity known as Phar-maMar. For the reasons set forth below, the auctioneer will be allowed the sum of $7500 to be paid by the estate.

II. Facts

The facts may be summarized briefly. Included in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtors. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Creditor-Appellant v. Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Matter of Baldwin-United Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
  3. Home Savings Ass'n of Kansas City, F.A. v. Woodstock Associates I, Inc. (In Re Woodstock Associates I, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  4. In Re Englewood Community Hospital Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  5. Bank of Silvis v. Boultinghouse Auction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API