Legal Opinion
Ciena Corp. v. Corvis Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 9, 2004No. CIV.A. 00-662-JJFPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Motion For The Immediate Entry Of An Injunction (D.I.561) filed by Plaintiffs CIENA Corporation and CIENA Properties, Inc. (collectively, “CIENA”). By its Motion CIENA contends that it is entitled to an order enjoining Defendant Corvis Corporation (“Corvis”) from continued infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,504,609 (the “’609 patent”) and 5,938,309 (the “’309 patent”). For the reasons discussed, the Court will grant CIENA’s Motion as it pertains to the ’309 patent and deny the Motion as it pertains to the ’609 patent.
DISCUS…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eric Robinson v. Philip L. Johnson the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Mike FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- H.H. Robertson, Company v. United Steel Deck, Inc. And Nicholas J. Bouras, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- John English v. Dennis Dyke Terry Pitcher Pamela Withrow and Linda FlanaganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Garlock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Gabrielle Eddy v. Virgin Islands Water And Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2005