Legal Opinion

Roder v. Goldsmith

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 3, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Civil Court lacked the power to assert in personam jurisdiction over the defendant on the basis of personal service of process in Nassau County. The action is founded On an out-of-city tort; the defendant is a nonresident of New York City, and the fact that he is regularly employed within the city will not justify extraterritorial service.

The orders should be reversed, with $10 costs, defendant’s motions granted and the complaint dismissed, with costs. .

Hofstadteb, J. P., Hecht and Gold, JJ., concur.

Orders reversed, etc.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Made-Ready Door Co., Division of Timbercraft, Inc. v. Fox Ledge Corp.Suffolk County District Court · 1976
  2. Tauz v. Allstate InsuranceNassau County District Court · 2003