Legal Opinion

People v. McCumber

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1858PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for judgment for plaintiff on account of the answer being sham and frivolous.

1Opinion of the Court

Hogeboom, Justice.

The language of the Code, (§ 152,) is without qualification, that “ sham and irrelevant answers and defences, may be stricken out on motion.” It does not, therefore, seem proper to limit its application to answers and defences setting up new matter. Nor would this accomplish the object doubtless intended by the legislature, to wit, to uproot defences not resting on truth and good faith. Improper delays and contrivances to defeat justice may be as effectually carried out through the agency of pleadings containing mere denials of the plaintiff’s allegations, as by those…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Catlin v. GunterThe Superior Court of New York City · 1852
  2. Conklin v. VandervoortNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haggart v. RanneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  2. Cottrill v. CramerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API