Hale v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
John Hale appeals from the superior court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company. Hale, an employee of the insured’s grocery store, was injured at the store while unloading watermelons in the course of the insured’s separate produce stand business. The superior court held that because Hale was injured at the grocery store, the “premises-operations” provision of the produce stand liability policy did not cover Hale’s injuries. While we find that the court erred in so holding, we also find that because the policy excluded coverage for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Marwell Construction, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Hahn v. Alaska Title Guaranty CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Davis v. HallettAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. Underwriters at Lloyds, LondonAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Whispering Creek Condominium Owner Ass'n v. Alaska National Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Hagans, Brown & Gibbs v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.