Legal Opinion
Louis Di Minno Construction Corp. v. Trombello
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 6, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The defendants move to dismiss the complaint for asserted insufficiency on its face (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 106). The complaint alleges in substance that: The defendants are insurance brokers. They were engaged by their customer, Louis Di Minno, to obtain a policy of insurance on a designated truck crane covering “ All Risk Insurance ”, including coverage of loss by “ upset and/or overturn ”. The defendants procured a policy of insurance from the Century Insurance Company, Ltd., a copy of which policy is annexed to the complaint. Thereafter, Di Minno transferred the truck crane to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kline Bros. & Co. v. German Union Fire Insurance Co. of BaltimoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Kline Bros. v. the German Un. Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Port Clyde Foods, Inc. v. Holiday Syrups, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Wings & Wheels Express, Inc. v. SisakNew York Supreme Court · 1973