Legal Opinion

American Express Centurion Bank v. Minckler

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 7, 2011No. 05-10-01045-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice FILLMORE.

American Express Centurion Bank sued Sarah Minckler for breach of contract. 1 The trial court found American Express was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because Minckler had defaulted on her obligations under the contract, but awarded no damages. In two issues, American Express argues the trial court erred by failing to award damages because Minck-ler’s admissions in her answer, Minckler’s deemed admissions in connection with American Express’s requests for admis sions, and the evidence admitted at trial established that American Express was entitled…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andrea Cano v. Tony Hodges and Carter BloodCare, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025
  2. Christopher Graham v. Darla Compton, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2022
  3. Wolfgang Hirczy v. Citibank, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API