Legal Opinion

Buck v. Union Electric Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1994No. 63612PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Judge.

Melvin Dean Buck appeals from a judgment non obstante veredicto. In a negligence action, Buck sued Union Electric for injuries sustained in a car crash with an oncoming vehicle which had entered his lane due to the partial obstruction of the roadway by Missouri Utilities 1 and remained there until the collision. At trial, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of Buck. The trial court entered its judgment non obstante ve-redicto finding that Missouri Utilities’ actions were not the proximate cause of Buck’s injuries. We affirm.

On the morning of Friday, March 12,1982, Missouri…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Krause v. US Truck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. Bayne v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Highfill v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Price v. SeidlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Kaelin v. NuelleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Heffernan v. ReinholdMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Weaks v. RuppMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Simonian v. Gevers Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Hale v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Amador v. Lea's Auto Sales & Leasing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API