Legal Opinion

William A. Graham Co. v. Haughey

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 5, 2009No. 08-2007, 08-2111PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOYITER, Circuit Judge.

We face an issue of first impression for this court — whether the discovery rule or the injury rule governs the accrual of claims under the Copyright Act, which has a three-year statute of limitations for civil actions, 17 U.S.C. § 507(b).

Under the injury rule, a claim accrues, and the statute of limitations begins to run, when the plaintiff suffers a legally cognizable injury. Therefore, if the injury rule applies in this case, appellant/crossappellee William A. Graham Company (“Graham”) cannot recover on its claims that appellees/cross-appellants…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Rotella v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Chicago Building Design, P.C. v. Mongolian House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Psihoyos v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  4. Andrew Leonard v. Stemtech International IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. Khadidja Issa v. Lancaster School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API