Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Chariton Circuit Court. — Hon. Fred Lamb, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND J.

This is a suit to recover the penalty provided by section 3330, Revised Statutes 1909. The case was tried by the court without the aid of a jury and there being a judgment for plaintiff, defendant has appealed.

Plaintiff, at 6:25 A. M. of August 7, 1917, delivered to the defendant at its office in Kansas City, Missouri, a telegram addressed to Roy McKittrick, at Triplett, Missouri. The message was not delivered until 11:42 A. M. of the same day, to plaintiff’s injury.

*625Defendant’s evidence tended to show that the usual, ordinary and customary way of routing messages from Kansas City,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hanley v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Bateman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BollingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Foster v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Klippel v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BushnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Ward v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Ward v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API