Legal Opinion

Newland v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1968No. 268S23PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter was initiated by the filing of a verified petition for a writ of certiorari. The issue before this court is whether the trial court erred in refusing permission to petitioner to file a belated motion for a new trial.

Under the rules of the Supreme Court of Indiana, Rule 2-40 is applicable. The pertinent part thereof, reads as follows:

“. . . the petition (for a belated motion for a new trial) must be personally verified by the party, specifically alleging when the cause was first discovered, how it was discovered, the facts showing the cause, and why such cause could not have been…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NassarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  2. Langley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Barrett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Robbins v. Inhabitants of TownsendMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1838

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Adams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. V. H. Juerling & Sons, Inc. v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Dobeski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API