Legal Opinion

Elliott Bay Seafoods, Inc. v. Port of Seattle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 12, 2004No. 52842-4-IPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Grosse, J.

— While parol, extrinsic, or collateral evidence may be heard to explain the context and intent of the parties in entering into a written contract, it will not be heard to modify, contradict, add to, or vary the terms of that written agreement. Here the written agreement is a lease between Elliot Bay Seafoods, Inc. (EBS) and the Port of *8Seattle (Port) for retail space at the Bell Street Pier (also known as Pier 66). The terms of the lease did not obligate the Port to develop the pier in accordance with any particular concept. Moreover, while there is ample evidence of the Port’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Klinke v. Famous Recipe Fried Chicken, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
  2. Tacoma Auto Mall, Inc. v. Nissan North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Kim v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Tae Yon Kim v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Glimcher Supermall Venture, LLC v. Coleman Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API