Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Huggins Diagnostic & Rehabilitation Center, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1997No. 96CA0586PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CRISWELL.

Plaintiff, Diane Bailey, instituted this action against defendants, Gino Ortegon, D.D.S., and Hal A. Huggins, D.D.S., both of whom were employed by defendant Huggins Diagnostic and Rehabilitation Center, Inc. (Center) in which Huggins is the sole stockholder. She sought to recover damages allegedly resulting to her from Ortegon’s dental malpractice, damages against Huggins for his alleged negligent misrepresentation, and a judgment against the Center, based on the actions of both, under the doctrine of respon-deat superior. After a trial, a jury returned verdicts in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Taco Bell, Inc. v. LannonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. University of Denver v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Leake v. CainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Perreira v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grozdanich v. Leisure Hills Health Center, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  2. Dunn v. American Family InsuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Dr. Bernd Wollschlaeger v. Governor of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  4. McMillan v. Togus Regional Office, Department of Veteran AffairsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  5. Sanders v. Acclaim Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API