Legal Opinion

People v. Cromer

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2001No. S076444Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

The confrontation clauses of both the federal and state Constitutions guarantee a criminal defendant the right to confront the prosecution’s witnesses. (U.S. Const., 6th Amend.; Cal. Const, art. I, § 15.) That right is not absolute, however. An exception exists when a witness is unavailable and, at a previous court proceeding against the same defendant, has given testimony that was subject to cross-examination. Under federal constitutional law, such testimony is admissible if the prosecution shows it made “a good-faith effort” to obtain the presence of the witness at trial.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API