Legal Opinion

Baumgartner v. Baumgartner

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1990No. S-3051PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

I. INTRODUCTION

This petition raises the question of whether an Alaska Superior Court, which renders the original marriage dissolution decree, retains jurisdiction to modify child custody when the non-custodial parent continues to reside in the state, but the custodial parent and children have lived outside the state for the past four years. More specifically, the issue is whether the court’s jurisdiction is limited by the terms of AS 25.30.020, the jurisdictional section of Alaska’s version of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, AS 25.30.010-910 (“UCCJA”). 1

II. FACTS AND…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Szmyd v. SzmydAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Waller v. RichardsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Leighton v. LeightonAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Layne v. NilesAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sidell v. SidellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  2. Pinneo v. PinneoAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bock v. BockAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Puhlman v. TurnerAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Josette F. v. Jaret O. and Jennifer O.Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API