Bacon v. Fox

Plaintiff had decree rescinding a trade of real estate for fraud.

Defendant Fox owned a waterpower gristmill, which he had sold twice and which had been returned to him, the first time voluntarily and the second time on rescission for fraud. Mezak v. Fox, 253. Mich. 326. In the summer of 1932 defendant Bradford, an attorney and son-in-law of Fox, advertised the property for sale. Plaintiff’s husband answered the advertisement and negotiations for a trade extended from July to November 7th.

Plaintiff and her husband visited the property twice. Bacon had had some experience in flour mills but…