Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 24, 1974No. 49158PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

Via certificate for immediate review, the defendant appeals from the denial of his special plea in bar to dismiss his indictment for armed robbery on the ground of the denial of a speedy trial. Held:

The four factors relevant for consideration in determining whether there was a violation of Sixth Amendment due process requirements for a speedy trial have been stated as: (a) Length of delay, (b) the reason for the delay, (c) the defendant’s assertion of his right, and (d) prejudice to the defendant. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U. S. 514, 530 (92 SC 2182, 33 LE2d 101); Mays u. State, 229…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. State v. HollomonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. State v. WeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Lett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API