Security Bank v. Holmes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for St-Louis county, Moer, J., striking out certain portions of their answer.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, a purchaser at a foreclosure sale, upon a covenant against incumbrances, contained in the mortgage, to recover the amount which it had to-pay to discharge prior incumbrances on the mortgaged premises. After our decision on a former appeal, 65 Minn. 531, 68 N. W. 113,. reversing an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, the defendants interposed an answer; and this appeal is from an order-striking out certain portions of that answer, paragraphs 6, 8, 9, 15,.. 17, 20, and part of 19, as irrelevant and redundant.
1. Paragraphs 6 and 9 of the answer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sandwich Mfg. Co. v. ZellmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- American Building & Loan Ass'n v. WaleenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Lawton v. St. Paul Permanent Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Security Bank v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rooney v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Clement v. WillettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Brinton v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Allis v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Gustafson v. GervaisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971