Legal Opinion

United States v. Moist

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 5, 1914No. 378PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is an indictment under § 215 of the Criminal Code of Marché, 1909, c. 321, 35 Stat. 1130, for placing a letter in the post-office for delivery by the post-office establishment for the purpose of executing a scheme to defraud. The scheme alleged was to send out puzzle pictures, advertising as a prize for the neatest correct answer a credit order for $350 on a certain piano, one for $300 for the next neatest, and others for $200 for correct answers. Persons answering were to be told that- they were entitled, for instance, to an order for $200 on a-piano sold the world over for $300, which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HastingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Eastman v. Armstrong-Byrd Music Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  3. United States v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Territory v. BelliveauHawaii Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API