Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mosebauer v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 1981No. Appeal, No. 2496 C.D. 1979Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Menoer:

I respectfully dissent.

*273I am of the view that claimant fulfilled her burden of showing good cause for her termination of employment, based upon the unreasonable modification of her job assignment. I must conclude that a doubling of claimant’s workload, without a concomitant increase in wages or hours, constitutes an unreasonable change in working conditions.

I do not agree that claimant should be denied benefits, as urged by the Board, simply because she failed to discuss the “personnel changes” with her employer. I note that, since an employer representative…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Freight, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. National Aluminum Corp. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Mann v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API