Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Booñe v. Orange Steel Erectors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 2000Published

1DissentPeters, J.

I respectfully dissent. Heedful that *631the Workers’ Compensation Board’s assessment of the credibility of witnesses and the inferences to be drawn therefrom will be determinative if supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Grucza v Waste Stream Technology, 252 AD2d 901; Matter of Billings v Dime Sav. Bank, 236 AD2d 649), I do not find the record here so lacking as to warrant our intrusion into that domain.

Claimant’s testimony, found wholly credible by the Board, detailed that he engaged in strenuous physical activity on behalf of this employer on May 3, May 6 and May 7, 1996. Admitting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Claim of Lawrence v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Grucza v. Waste Stream TechnologyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Claim of Lewis v. Cambridge Filter Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Claim of Latanya Billings v. Dime Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Claim of Cortese v. Rochester Products Division, G.M.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API