Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reeves v. Vannoy

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 23, 2017No. 16-KP-2199PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

h Denied. Relator shows no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to deny his request to further supplement his application for post-conviction relief. See State ex rel. Duhon v. Whitley, 92-1740 (La. 9/2/94), 642 So.2d 1273 (district court has discretion to decide whether to allow a post-conviction petitioner to amend or supplement a timely-filed application for post-conviction relief); cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(E). Within 90 days of this order, the district court is ordered to rule on all of relator’s now pending claims. See State v. Reeves, 15-1668 (La. 4/4/16), 188 So.3d 257.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Duhon v. WhitleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. State v. ReevesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ReevesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2018