Legal Opinion

Foland v. Malander

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1986No. 84-630PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff for injuries he suffered when he was struck and trampled by defendant’s bull. Plaintiff sought special damages for medical expenses and extra help hired during his recovery, and general damages for pain and suffering and permanent injury to his hand. Defendant denied any liability for plaintiff’s injuries and affirmatively alleged assumption of risk and contributory negligence as bars to plaintiff’s recovery. The trial court overruled plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict on the basis of strict liability but directed a verdict of negligence as a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lesher v. GetmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Schmidt Ex Rel. Schmidt v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Watson Bros. Transportation Co. v. JacobsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Keith v. TilfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Lingonner v. AmblerNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lynn v. METROPOLITAN UTILITIES DISTRICTNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Mandery v. Chronicle Broadcasting Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Carpender v. BendorfNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Frazier v. WineingerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
  5. Mandery v. Chronicle Broadcasting Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API