Legal Opinion

Fatsis v. 360 Clinton Avenue Tenants Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 30, 2000PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs are not obligated to pay an attorney’s fee to the defendant 360 Clinton Avenue Tenants Corp. in the principal sum of $8,046.94, representing the amount the plaintiffs paid into an escrow account, and, in effect, that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover the money held in escrow, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), entered February 24, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendant 360 Clinton Avenue Tenants Corp. and against them in the principal sum…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nestor v. McDowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. 25 East 83 Corp. v. 83rd Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DKR Mortgage Asset Trust 1 v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Village of Hempstead v. TaliercioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Luis Lopez & Son's, Inc. v. Dannie's Auto CakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Matter of Milton R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. 490 Owners Corp. v. IsraelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API