Legal Opinion
Balsam v. Fioriglio
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur M. Schack, J.
In this foreclosure action for the premises located at 3801 Oceanview Avenue, Brooklyn, New York (block 6955, lot 29, County of Kings), plaintiff Howard A. Balsam (Balsam), a member of the New York State bar, seeks a judgment of foreclosure and sale against pro se defendants Patrick Fioriglio (Patrick) and Zenda Fioriglio (Zenda). The court conducted a bench trial on December 18, 2012 and reserved decision. Both sides were given an opportunity to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the court and they did so. After a review of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Walker v. GerliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Campaign v. BarbaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re MerhiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2014