Legal Opinion

Gonce v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 1984No. CA CR 83-186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Judge.

Appellant appeals from his second degree forgery conviction for which he was sentenced to eight years in prison with four years suspended. He raises two points for reversal: (1) that the trial court erred in ruling that voluntary intoxication is a mitigating factor in setting punishment instead of a complete defense, and (2) that substantial evidence was not presented to show he had the requisite purposeful state of mind to commit forgery.

Appellant’s case was tried to the trial court, and he bases his first contention on remarks made by the judge at the trial’s conclusion.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chisum v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Olles v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Varnedare v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Mayes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Keith v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Mounts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API