Borroum v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Concurrence
CONCURRING OPINION.
Without restating the testimony, I desire to supplement the opinion rendered with the following statement of the reasons which impel me to concur in the overruling of the motion for rehearing: I gather from the testimony that it was the appellant who first mentioned to Cox the subject-matter of the quarrel, namely, the mules topping the fence. It was he who first used harsh language; that when the deceased replied in kind, the appellant ran to his house and procured his gun. When he returned the deceased was milking his cow. When the appellant was a short distance from the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Gaines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904