Davis v. Pauler
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at this court at the March term, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith
The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called plaintiffs, began a suit in the Municipal Court of Chicago against the defendant in error, hereinafter called defendant, for the sum of three hundred dollars claimed as commission in a real estate transaction. At the close of the plaintiff’s case on the trial, the court of its own motion directed a verdict for the defendant. On the directed verdict the court entered judgment and the plaintiffs sued out this writ of error.
The plaintiffs, licensed real estate brokers in the city of Chicago, were engaged by the defendant to ne- ' gotiate an exchange of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilson v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Fox v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Lawrence v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Kuhn v. EppsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- McCampbell v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wolfenberger v. MadisonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976