Legal Opinion

Holland v. Gladden

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 16, 1963No. Civ. No. 63-259PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOLOMON, Chief Judge.

Petitioner filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus to set aside his conviction and twenty-year sentence based upon his plea of guilty to an information charging him with rape. Petitioner does not attack the five-year sentence for burglary, simultaneously imposed upon him. Petitioner admits that he committed the burglary and that he freely confessed and entered his plea on that count. However, petitioner alleges that he was coerced into signing a confession to the charge of rape. He further alleges that this coercion followed *655him into court and vitiated his waiver…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  4. United States ex rel. Jackson v. BanmillerDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden Oregon State Penitentiary v. Paul Courter HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Miller v. GladdenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964
  3. Lewis v. GladdenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API