Legal Opinion
Felder v. McBride
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 21, 2004No. 02-3574, 02-3575PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Indiana inmate John B. Felder seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 from two decisions of a prison disciplinary board that together revoked 120 days of his earned credit time. Felder has a protected liberty interest in these credits, so he may not be deprived of them without the minimum requirements of due process. Piggie v. McBride, 277 F.3d 922, 924 (7th Cir.2002) (per curiam); Montgomery v. Anderson, 262 F.3d 641, 645 (7th Cir.2001). As relevant here, due process includes advance written notice of the charges, Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 564, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- James L. Webb v. Ron Anderson, Superintendent, Indiana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Clyde Piggie v. Zettie CottonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Jerry Montgomery v. Rondle Anderson, Warden, Indiana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ramirez v. NietzelKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Cobbs v. SuperintendentDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- Conover v. LawlessMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- COLEMAN v. BROWNDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
- Dixon v. BottomCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.