Legal Opinion

Loveless v. Gilliam

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 2, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before Keugi-i, J., Greenville, April, 1904. Action by R. F. Loveless against Simms Gilliam and P. T. Hayne. From Circuit order, affirming judgment of magistrate, defendants appeal. cites: Landlord is entitled to crop until division: 1 Hill, 364, 399; but division has already been made. cite: Plaintiff is owner of crop until division: 6 S. C., 297; 15 S. C., 87; 18 S. C., 310; and defendant has his remedy for division: Code, 1902, 2716, 3059.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Circuit Court, affirming the judgment of a magistrate court in favor of plaintiff in an action of claim and delivery for a bale of cotton. The undisputed facts are that, in 1904, the defendant cultivated plaintiff’s lands under circumstances which made him a laborer upon shares of the crops grown by him. Three bales of cotton were raised upon the place. The first two were placed in the warehouse of P. T. Playne in plaintiff’s name, by her direction. The plaintiff directed defendant to* store the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ingram Tedder v. Merchants & Manufacturers Insurance Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. Hardwick v. PageSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. Manos v. EassySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  4. Salley v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API