Clarence Ditlow v. Claude S. Brinegar, Secretary of the Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
The only issue on this appeal is whether appellees have a right of access under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, to correspondence between the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and automobile manufacturers in connection with pend ing safety defect investigations. 1 The District Court, in an opinion reported at 362 F.Supp. 1321 (D.D.C.1973), ruled with respect to this correspondence that appellants had not made out their claims of exemption under exemptions 4 and 7 of the Act. We find it necessary to deal only with the latter.
Exemption 7 involves investigatory files…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Ditlow v. VolpeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
3Cited by52 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Federal Bureau of Investigation v. AbramsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pratt v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.