Merriman v. Sarlo
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court. David W. Carroll, Chancellor. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. On the 17th day of July, 1894, the appellee filed his complaint in the Pulaski chancery court, and alleged, in substance, that Merriman & Meukus had, on the 18th day of April, 1894, brought suit before Hiram Robbins, a justice of the peace of Big Rock township, Pulaski county, Arkansas, against one Fred Blittersdorf for the sum of $75, and at the time procured an attachment from said…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court. David W. Carroll, Chancellor. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. On the 17th day of July, 1894, the appellee filed his complaint in the Pulaski chancery court, and alleged, in substance, that Merriman & Meukus had, on the 18th day of April, 1894, brought suit before Hiram Robbins, a justice of the peace of Big Rock township, Pulaski county, Arkansas, against one Fred Blittersdorf for the sum of $75, and at the time procured an attachment from said justice, which was levied on the east 70 feet of lots 11 and 12 and all of lot 9 ,in block 199, in the city of Little…
1Opinion of the Court
Hughes, J.,
(after stating the facts.) The jurisdiction of the justice of the peace to issue an attachment and have the constable levy the same on real estate, and to transmit his judgment to the circuit court to be there enforced, is fully provided for by sections 4421-4423, Sand. & H. Dig. The constitutionality of these provisions has been settled in Bush v. Visant, 40 Ark. 129.
The removal of the disabilities generally of a minor by a judgment of the circuit court authorizing the minor to transact business “in general,” and providing that acts done by the minor “shall have the same force and…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Transportation Co. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- McKinney v. BlakelySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908