Legal Opinion
Naranjo v. Ricketts
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 27, 1982No. Nos. 82-1534, 82-1546PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of these appeals. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The causes are therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
The captioned cases are the appeals from separate petitions for habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Both petitioners raise identical issues; therefore, for purposes of this opinion, they shall be treated together.
Sammy and Rojorlo Roy Naranjo were found guilty of first degree kidnapping and first degree sexual assault. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. NaranjoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- People v. NaranjoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
3Cited by22 opinions
- Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Robert A. Prather v. John Rees, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Will Stone v. City And County Of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- William Lee Thompson v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Landano v. RaffertyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.