Stackhouse v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
COUCH, Judge.
The issue in this case is whether evidence seized contemporaneously with arrest in a warrantless search of an area beyond appellant’s immediate control is admissible on the ground that another person might have concealed or destroyed the evidence. In a trial before the court, the evidence was admitted and appellant was found guilty of robbery with a deadly weapon and burglary. The Court of Special Appeals found no error in admitting the evidence and affirmed in an unreported per curiam opinion. We granted certiorari to consider this important issue. We find that in introducing…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- McMillian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Wengert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.