Frank v. Geiger
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity. Three suits for infringement of design patents Nos. 33,961, 33,962, and 33,963, all for designs for end frames of bedsteads, and No. 33,964, for a design for a corner post of bedsteads, all issued to David Frank January 22, 1901. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
WHEELER, District Judge.
The patents, although somewhat objected to, seem to be well enough; and infringement by sale, although denied, seems to be fairly made out. The plaintiffs made and sold their bedsteads to the defendants and other jobbers for resale, *127and first procured decalcomanie labels for marking them as patented, with the date of these patents, February 19th; and two of the bills of complaint were sworn to February 21, and the other February 26, 1901. The labels are not shown to have been affixed to many of the bedsteads or posts, nor to any that reached the defendants before the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Adler v. SeamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Whistle Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1927
- Bush & Lane Piano Co. v. Becker Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Young v. Grand Rapids Refrigerator Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
- Frank v. JonesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.