Legal Opinion
Caudy v. Rivkin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover malpractice, plaintiffs appeal, (1) as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Burchell, J.), dated March 13, 1984, as granted certain branches of defendant’s motion for an order directing the service of a further bill of particulars, or, in the alternative, for preclusion, and (2) from a further order of said court, dated June 26, 1984, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for a stay of the aforesaid order pending appeal, granted defendant’s cross motion requiring plaintiffs to perfect their appeal within…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sobel v. Midchester Jewish CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Goldstein v. Brogan Cadillac Oldsmobile Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Panarelli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Langella v. D'Agostino Supermarket, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mahr v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Castellano v. Norwegian Christian Home & Health Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Monzon v. ChiaramonteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Benn v. O'DalyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Kwang Sik Kim v. A & K Plastic Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.