Legal Opinion

Soule v. City of Passaic

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On final hearing on bill, answer and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The o-bject of the bill is to have the defendant perpetually-restrained from discharging surface-waters from a section of the-city of Passaic known as “ North Passaic,” by means of drains,, into a ditch which runs through the complainants’, lands.

The property of the complainants is a portion of a considerable tract of low, marshy land, over which the city of Passaicextends and through which it has laid out and, to some extent-improved, streets. The evidence discloses that, for half a century or more, the Paterson plank road has run, from east to west, through this low land, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Noonan v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cassini v. OrangeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Yonadi v. Homestead Country HomesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Consolidated Safety Pin Co. v. MontclairNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  4. Peter Wendel Sons, Inc. v. NewarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API