Soule v. City of Passaic
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing on bill, answer and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The o-bject of the bill is to have the defendant perpetually-restrained from discharging surface-waters from a section of the-city of Passaic known as “ North Passaic,” by means of drains,, into a ditch which runs through the complainants’, lands.
The property of the complainants is a portion of a considerable tract of low, marshy land, over which the city of Passaicextends and through which it has laid out and, to some extent-improved, streets. The evidence discloses that, for half a century or more, the Paterson plank road has run, from east to west, through this low land, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Noonan v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cassini v. OrangeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Yonadi v. Homestead Country HomesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Consolidated Safety Pin Co. v. MontclairNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Peter Wendel Sons, Inc. v. NewarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946