Legal Opinion

Rapak v. Companion Life Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 30, 1992No. 23742PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Justice:

The following question is before us on certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit:

Whether an incontestability clause contained in an employer-funded group life insurance policy bars the insurer from defending its decision not to pay death benefits on the ground that an express condition of coverage that the insured be a full-time employee was not met because the insured was not employed by the employer at the inception of coverage or at any time thereafter.

FACTS

The decedent in this case, Mrs. Rapak, was employed full-time with White Oak Manor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wright v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richard J. Rapak v. Companion Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API