Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith & Walker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1891No. 7077PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Johnson. Tried, below before Hon. J. M. Hall. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Associate Justice.

This suit was instituted by the appellees to recover the amount named in the following agreement:

“December 23, 1884.
“Know all men by these presents that we, Thomas Smith and Phil. Walker, have this day rented to J. W. Smith 120 acres of land, more or less, for $250, seven miles west of Cleburne; said crops now planted and to be planted on said land to be held and controlled by said Smith and Walker until said rents are fully satisfied.

[Signed] “Thomas Smith,

“Phil. Walker, “J. W. Smith.”

The cause whs transferred from the County to the District Court, and plaintiffs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. HaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oriental Investment Co. v. BarclayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Robinson v. FavilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Yori v. PhenixNevada Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Independent Order of Puritans v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Young v. SeverySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API